Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 625948" data-attributes="member: 9033">So, let's remove Rodgers and Cobb from the discussion. Let's say quarterback A throws a 10-yard pass directly sideways to a wide open receiver. That receiver then uses his speed and agility to outrun the defense to the edge and runs the ball in for a TD. In your opinion, the QB deserves the credit for hitting the wide open receiver with one of the easiest passes in the NFL?PFF ain't perfect. I'm struggling to get some to think about what the rating might tell you to look at. That's all the rating is saying. The rating isn't saying Rodgers was bad, it's just saying that maybe Randall Cobb was phenomenal in this game. When a receiver is REALLY good, naturally the QB is going to look good as well. I would also add that the offensive coordinator deserves some credit as well because many of those TDs were built around a second receiver (Montgomery a couple of times if I recall) picking off the primary defender for Cobb, thus allowing Cobb to just have to beat the help.I get that it's a Packers fan board but I don't recall people having this kind of issue when Calvin Johnson was making Matthew Stafford look great in some games. Cobb isn't as good as Johnson and Rodgers is way better than Stafford (like, they play a different sport better) so it's very rare to see a game in which Cobb (or anyone else) can make Rodgers look better.</blockquote>

Total: 112 (members: 1, guests: 111)