Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Falcons: Studs n Duds: Whats Tanking Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 807210"><p>I cannot say we agree. I do not detect sarcasm in that comment, but I guess I cannot rule it out.</p><p></p><p>Not using the short passing had nothing to do with the sacks in this game. Jailbreaks and rapidly collapsing pockets were the order of the day. These were not 2.5+ seconds, looking for the long ball, sacks.</p><p></p><p>If you're not going to let Rodgers be Rodgers, turning him into a short throw pocket passer, you're bound to be disappointed. Put a defense out there with 2-high safeties and slow LBs and you'll get what you want. We've seen that before. But it doesn't come around very often. And he's going to pass up the open short option if he likes what he sees downfield. That's the way it has always been and its not something you should expect to change.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 807210"] I cannot say we agree. I do not detect sarcasm in that comment, but I guess I cannot rule it out. Not using the short passing had nothing to do with the sacks in this game. Jailbreaks and rapidly collapsing pockets were the order of the day. These were not 2.5+ seconds, looking for the long ball, sacks. If you're not going to let Rodgers be Rodgers, turning him into a short throw pocket passer, you're bound to be disappointed. Put a defense out there with 2-high safeties and slow LBs and you'll get what you want. We've seen that before. But it doesn't come around very often. And he's going to pass up the open short option if he likes what he sees downfield. That's the way it has always been and its not something you should expect to change. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
R
Best FA in NFL History
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Questions that Define the Draft (2025)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 11:47 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Todd Princl
Yesterday at 7:49 PM
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:46 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Falcons: Studs n Duds: Whats Tanking Edition
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
