Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers sign Devin Funchess
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 869785"><p>The difference being that MVS was a fifth round pick and Allison went undrafted.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My point is that the Packers need to draft a wide receiver capable of having an immediate impact during his rookie season. Otherwise it might be possible that the passing offense will struggle for another season with Rodgers' championship window closing fast.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, at this point I don't see any other options though. With that being said I'm still waiting for you to present another one aside of spending an early rounder on a rookie receiver.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually the Packers not signing Hooper or another veteran tight end besides Lewis increases the importance of a rookie wide receiver putting up decent numbers next season.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At this point the best case scenario is a rookie receiver earning the second spot on the depth chart behind Adams and living up to expectations.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's pretty easy to refute your gut feeling considering Rodgers targeted Lazard 52 times over the last 11 games last season though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The receiver being in the exact position Rodgers expects him to be is of utmost importance. Otherwise it will be close to impossible to inlcude him in his progression.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think that would be a positive outlook for next season though. And as HRE has pointed out in this thread it's more likely that even a quarterback selected in the first round doesn't live up to expectations.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I can't speak for other posters but I didn't like the Packers trading three picks to move up to select Spriggs from the beginning.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's total BS though as Rodgers targeting Adams on only 31.8% of his attempts after the receiver came back from his injury. With him being by far the most talented player at the position it would be ludicrous to expect that number to be lower.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 869785"] The difference being that MVS was a fifth round pick and Allison went undrafted. My point is that the Packers need to draft a wide receiver capable of having an immediate impact during his rookie season. Otherwise it might be possible that the passing offense will struggle for another season with Rodgers' championship window closing fast. Well, at this point I don't see any other options though. With that being said I'm still waiting for you to present another one aside of spending an early rounder on a rookie receiver. Actually the Packers not signing Hooper or another veteran tight end besides Lewis increases the importance of a rookie wide receiver putting up decent numbers next season. At this point the best case scenario is a rookie receiver earning the second spot on the depth chart behind Adams and living up to expectations. It's pretty easy to refute your gut feeling considering Rodgers targeted Lazard 52 times over the last 11 games last season though. The receiver being in the exact position Rodgers expects him to be is of utmost importance. Otherwise it will be close to impossible to inlcude him in his progression. I don't think that would be a positive outlook for next season though. And as HRE has pointed out in this thread it's more likely that even a quarterback selected in the first round doesn't live up to expectations. I can't speak for other posters but I didn't like the Packers trading three picks to move up to select Spriggs from the beginning. It's total BS though as Rodgers targeting Adams on only 31.8% of his attempts after the receiver came back from his injury. With him being by far the most talented player at the position it would be ludicrous to expect that number to be lower. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:55 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Draft Talk
Always Fun To Read These Stories
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:03 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 6:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers sign Devin Funchess
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
