Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1060729" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>I think Goodell's recent comments/approach on the matter makes it clear he is intending to get rid of the play and IMO it's a matter of "when" rather than "if" at this point. The straw-poll was not particularly close, last I heard with only 16 votes in favor rather than the requisite 24. The fact that they then elected to "table" the matter until next month suggests to me they're planning to revise their approach and continue with trying to remove it (if you were indifferent and just polling opinion and came back with those results, I think you'd just move on rather than review again a month later, but that's just my opinion). But it sounds more and more like the intention is to roll back to the pre-2005 "aiding the runner" rules; in this way it serves to eliminate the "**** push" while also not appearing to single out Philly:</p><p></p><p>"I think that makes a lot of sense in many ways because that expands it beyond that single play...There are a lot of plays where you see people pushing or pulling somebody that are not in the **** push formation that I think do have an increased risk of injury. So I think the Committee will look at that and come back in May with some proposals.”</p><p></p><p>In any case I think the thing to remember is that the league is ultimately in the entertainment business. They will bring up player safety concerns (and I'm not saying it isn't a concern at all) but at the end of the day they are going to try and present the most entertaining three-ish hour "program" that they can. I saw some poll on ESPN today where something like 70%+ of respondents said it was not an "entertaining" play to watch, and I think many coaches share the same sentiment. So basically I think the league's looking at it and thinking they can remove a portion of their "show" that the majority of viewers simply don't find entertaining. It's nothing against Philly personally and I think injury concerns are secondary; they just think people don't like watching it very much (and they're probably right) and want to trim away the "less entertaining" bits wherever possible.</p><p></p><p>(Of course, I don't really know how to reconcile that with the kickoff/onside changes, but whatever...)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 1060729, member: 17987"] I think Goodell's recent comments/approach on the matter makes it clear he is intending to get rid of the play and IMO it's a matter of "when" rather than "if" at this point. The straw-poll was not particularly close, last I heard with only 16 votes in favor rather than the requisite 24. The fact that they then elected to "table" the matter until next month suggests to me they're planning to revise their approach and continue with trying to remove it (if you were indifferent and just polling opinion and came back with those results, I think you'd just move on rather than review again a month later, but that's just my opinion). But it sounds more and more like the intention is to roll back to the pre-2005 "aiding the runner" rules; in this way it serves to eliminate the "**** push" while also not appearing to single out Philly: "I think that makes a lot of sense in many ways because that expands it beyond that single play...There are a lot of plays where you see people pushing or pulling somebody that are not in the **** push formation that I think do have an increased risk of injury. So I think the Committee will look at that and come back in May with some proposals.” In any case I think the thing to remember is that the league is ultimately in the entertainment business. They will bring up player safety concerns (and I'm not saying it isn't a concern at all) but at the end of the day they are going to try and present the most entertaining three-ish hour "program" that they can. I saw some poll on ESPN today where something like 70%+ of respondents said it was not an "entertaining" play to watch, and I think many coaches share the same sentiment. So basically I think the league's looking at it and thinking they can remove a portion of their "show" that the majority of viewers simply don't find entertaining. It's nothing against Philly personally and I think injury concerns are secondary; they just think people don't like watching it very much (and they're probably right) and want to trim away the "less entertaining" bits wherever possible. (Of course, I don't really know how to reconcile that with the kickoff/onside changes, but whatever...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
tynimiller
PikeBadger
SudsMcBucky
Latest posts
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: tynimiller
9 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: PikeBadger
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: PikeBadger
22 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top