Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 886237">A couple of takeways from the rundown in my previous post.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The throws not listed were spot on the money.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If you're going to get on your phone to thumb out a one-liner summing up Rodgers first half All Pro performance it probably shouldn't be, "Rodgers is completing a lot of passes .... but his accuracy has not been all that great."</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">After putting up a 23-34-283-4-0 stat line that statement borders on an oxymoron and you probably shouldn't double down.  When you take out the 5 prudent throwaways and the MVS drop, you're at 23-28.  Now you're really at the point of an oxymoron, having missed the forest for the trees entirely.</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">But that's OK.  Everybody is entitled to an opinion.  Several have chimed in to agree with that assessment.  That's OK too.  What you should not do, however, is call the opposing opinion, respectfully submitted, "bullsh*t".  That's just stupid, and I use that word rarely and with careful consideration.  What really frosts me and what's really stupid is having a moderator back that up in calling out the other guy.</li> </ul></blockquote>

Total: 48 (members: 1, guests: 47)