Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1050950" data-attributes="member: 10086">I was going to say the same thing. EXCEPT I’d keep Reed. I’d be open to trading 1 of either Watson or Doubs.My twist on it? Let’s say you get a 4th/7th swap. I’d go after an upgrade at WR.Rd1 DE (Preston replacement with better 4-3 fit)Rd2 WRRd3 CBRD4 LBRD4 CBIdeally sign a DT in FA who is a known quantity in that $10-15M annual that provides a boost inside.I just feel like if we hit on a really dynamic Boundary WR? (George Pickens was a favorite of many of us that draft) We’d be really dynamic if we hit on a boundary WR like we did with Reed at Slot. We’d also have the position pipelined in as contracts come due. I’d even be ok with moving up slightly if we’re picking around 60ish (such as a Top 50 area guy) if an ideal fit is there.Doubling Down on CB by Rd4 gives us a really good chance of a starting level player rising in that room. I’d part with Stoked that project is coming to a finish.If we had Reed, then hit on a Pickens equivalent Draft pick, Watson and Wicks? Holding Melton in reserve to move up a spot? Then Musgrave and/or Kraft and Lloyd and Jacobs? That’s FULL grouping is Top3-5 quality.</blockquote>

Total: 64 (members: 6, guests: 58)