Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Overtime changes ideas
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daryl Muellenberg" data-source="post: 649040" data-attributes="member: 9708"><p>Sorry, but a FG shootout involving just special teams is not involving the 'whole team' - that is not semantics. Where have I ever said that kickers aren't part of the whole team? Just because I don't want just one part of the team to determine the outcome doesn't mean I don't count kickers as part of the team - and saying that the idea went completely over my head is ridiculous. The entire game has been played with all parts of the team participating, now you want to include only the special teams? With your idea, at that point the whole team now consists of only the kicking special teams. My idea still includes the whole team (including kickers), while your idea excludes the offense and defense which play a bigger role during the game than what the kickers do.</p><p></p><p>You are correct, this was about ideas and I just happen to disagree with your idea and have explained why I disagree. I have never said that to be fair both teams need to get an equal number of possessions. My idea was each team gets at least 1 possession regardless of whether the fist team scores a td or not. After that, if the game is still tied then go to sudden death. Let the 'whole team' determine the outcome, not just the kickers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daryl Muellenberg, post: 649040, member: 9708"] Sorry, but a FG shootout involving just special teams is not involving the 'whole team' - that is not semantics. Where have I ever said that kickers aren't part of the whole team? Just because I don't want just one part of the team to determine the outcome doesn't mean I don't count kickers as part of the team - and saying that the idea went completely over my head is ridiculous. The entire game has been played with all parts of the team participating, now you want to include only the special teams? With your idea, at that point the whole team now consists of only the kicking special teams. My idea still includes the whole team (including kickers), while your idea excludes the offense and defense which play a bigger role during the game than what the kickers do. You are correct, this was about ideas and I just happen to disagree with your idea and have explained why I disagree. I have never said that to be fair both teams need to get an equal number of possessions. My idea was each team gets at least 1 possession regardless of whether the fist team scores a td or not. After that, if the game is still tied then go to sudden death. Let the 'whole team' determine the outcome, not just the kickers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Capitol 8805
Latest posts
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
Latest: tynimiller
18 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: milani
35 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
43 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Voyageur
47 minutes ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Get Your Takes Off
Latest: Dantés
Today at 12:10 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Overtime changes ideas
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top