Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 833610" data-attributes="member: 10086">yeah. No way does an entire team of scouts and personnel overlook a #12 pick. The top 15 players at minimum are heavily scrutinized. The only thing that a limited stat sheet tells me is that the personnel team in GB feels like Rashan is going to really excel. Rashan likely had tape that’s been reviewed, compared, weighed, argued, debated and heavily scrutinized. They likely had additional feedback from the DC Coordinator and his staff.I guess what I’m saying is they didn’t go into this pick blind. They didn’t ignore the limited stats, they didn’t ignore a shoulder injury. They didn’t ignore the negatives. They must’ve thought his upside would far offset the risk. That excites me to know he must be viewed as not being anywhere close to his ceiling. I hope he reaches that potential. We just might have a monster there at #12.Gary also graded out very strong as far as the consensus profile. Some analysts bandwagon, but It’s unlikely that many in the industry give a 6.31 type draft (instant starter grade)  to someone who has limited stats in college (our argument) unless they see Beaucoup unrealized potential or a player in a system being mis-utilized or a combination thereof.  Those type grades don’t get handed out lightly and generally come with elite college production.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 88 (members: 0, guests: 88)