Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Our WR Corps in 2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 839500" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Shepherd's skill set as a traditional slot is kind of unique among the receiving corps, and he offers ST value that Lazard does not. I've also seen suggestion that backup corners have played Lazard with outside leverage, allowing him to get inside and seal them off with his size. The theory is that legit NFL corners won't respect his speed to the outside, will therefore play him with inside leverage, and thus will render him a lot less effective. </p><p></p><p>That's one theory. I'm not claiming it's definitely correct, but it's interesting. </p><p></p><p>As for replacing Bolton, I don't personally get how those FA options would fit. Martinez, Crawford, and Summers are all naturally better fits as the MIKE in this defense. They need a WILL. The FA options out there seem like more of what the Packers already have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 839500, member: 12283"] Shepherd's skill set as a traditional slot is kind of unique among the receiving corps, and he offers ST value that Lazard does not. I've also seen suggestion that backup corners have played Lazard with outside leverage, allowing him to get inside and seal them off with his size. The theory is that legit NFL corners won't respect his speed to the outside, will therefore play him with inside leverage, and thus will render him a lot less effective. That's one theory. I'm not claiming it's definitely correct, but it's interesting. As for replacing Bolton, I don't personally get how those FA options would fit. Martinez, Crawford, and Summers are all naturally better fits as the MIKE in this defense. They need a WILL. The FA options out there seem like more of what the Packers already have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
weeds
Latest posts
Brewers 2025!
Latest: weeds
7 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: tynimiller
20 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: tynimiller
22 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: DoURant
39 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
45 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Our WR Corps in 2019
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top