Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackAttack12" data-source="post: 844140" data-attributes="member: 11933">Having gone through the 40 AR drop backs against the Bears in pretty good detail, most of those plays he was going to his first option.In regards to how fast he's getting the ball out, a few of his extended plays where he escapes the pocket or improvises can skew those snap to throw numbers. For the most part, I think he was getting the ball out in an acceptable amount of time. Also, the fact that the Packers were in a lot of 3rd and 10+ situations will also skew those numbers, as the play designs were set up to where Rodgers had to wait for receivers to get to the sticks for a high percentage first down possibility.Additionally, sacks aren't the only metric to demonstrate whether or not the offensive line provided adequate protection. There are also hurries, QB hits, throwaways, etc.Anyone with a decent set of eyes could clearly see that our offensive line got their collective ***** handed to them by the Bears defensive front. Bulaga and Bakh held up their end of the bargain for the most part, but interior pressures damn near put Rodgers on the sidelines before he was able to get through his first progression.I really like stats, but they rarely tell the whole story. And for any statistical metric to suggest that they've performed as the 2nd best unit in the league should tell you that the metric is quite flawed.Protection was solid against Minny. Chicago though? Hell nah.</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

weeds

Total: 106 (members: 1, guests: 105)

Latest posts

Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: Voyageur
- 55 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
- Latest: Todd Princl
- Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 9:26 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: Dantés
- Yesterday at 9:20 PM
Draft Talk