Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 843209" data-attributes="member: 4199">I'd say it was clear interference.  The NFL officials Twitter had Cook highlighted.  He looked like a fullback leading up in the hole on Savage.  IMHO, clear and obvious OPI.This is the part I think some people get wrong, or at minimum, are communicating their grump poorly.The league did not review the play due to OPI.  This was caught during the "all scoring plays are reviewed" rule.  So they reviewed the play, saw OPI and threw the metaphorical flag.  This was a stated outcome when the rules committee presented the rule change to the owners.I feel conflicted on this.  It was pretty clear OPI to me, but the idea that a penalty can be throw after the fact is a little odd to me.That said, this is already allowed for 12 men--flag can be thrown after the fact.  That one is a little more cut and dried, but there is still an example of this basic procedure.</blockquote>

Total: 142 (members: 7, guests: 135)