Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC Championship - Los Angeles Rams vs. New Orleans Saints
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Do7" data-source="post: 816362" data-attributes="member: 13398"><p>1. So you're making my point that Rodgers would've thrived in that system, and based off how well that system is, combined with Rodgers skillset, and having a coach like Belichick, chances are Rodgers would do equally as well as opposed to Brady doing better than Rodgers here in GB.</p><p></p><p>2. Sure you were. For starters when you said players play harder for Brady as opposed to Rodgers. You have no way of proving that, as you would have to look into the hearts of each player. I'm certain those who play for Rodgers played just as hard as those for Brady, because both of those guys are capable of leading teams to victories, and you have a shot as long a they are on the field. Everyone leads differently. If you prefer Brady over Rodgers in regards of leadership that's fine. I prefer Brees personally so I won't argue with you there.</p><p></p><p>3. We've already established that McCarthy has a tendency to do questionable play calling decisions. So just because Rodgers changes the play every now and then, doesn't mean that he would be a total rebel with Belichick. With an OC like McDaniels calling plays, and playing into a system like NE's that helps create schemes to have receivers open, chances are Rodgers wouldn't have to free style.</p><p></p><p>4. Funny there's also leading by example, and considering Rodgers has played lights on more times than not, in which we've won the division and constantly making the post season outside these two years. As I told you earlier it takes leadership to lead your team down the field in order to win games, as well as comebacks. Again if you prefer Brady's leadership over Arodg, that is fine. That's personal preference.</p><p></p><p>5. I am tickled that you're trying to make an argument in regards to the AFC East not being a weak division, let alone compare it to our division which is tougher. How many times has that division produced more than one team making the post season in comparison to the NFCN? C'mon man.</p><p></p><p>As for The Patriots record goes against NFC teams, yeah but timing is everything, and they only have to play those teams once. Take for instance, do you honestly believe The Patriots would have their way if they had to play in the NFC South, with Brees, Ryan, and Newton? The NFC North, with Rodgers, The Vikings defense, Chicago's defense? Or the time when Detroit was formidable? The NFC West with the LOB at their peak, or San Fran under the Harbaugh era? or The Rams now? How about Arizona when they were formidable? It's not saying much when typically in the AFC over the years you could win the division with 9-7.</p><p></p><p>6. I have showed evidence in which I have blatantly held Rodgers accountable. Don't even try it. Matter of fact I will bring up an example.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I have held Rodgers accountable when the situation calls for it. I have stated on multiple occasions that my issues with Rodgers this season is pertaining to his GAME, as he could play better. The difference between you and I is that you're making it seem as Rodgers is largely responsible for how the season went when he is just a part of it. I've never absolved him of any blame. All this stuff regarding up his leadership, throwing people under the bus (which he never has), no one was making a huge fuss prior to these past two years as it never was an issue as we've been making the post season and usually winning the division outside these past two years, and last year was due to injury. Rodgers was always the first to blame himself when things went wrong, whether it was or not.</p><p></p><p>7. I agree you that Rodgers can hold on to the ball too long, and some of the sacks are on him, but you and I both know that the Oline has failed protecting him which results in him scrambling. He gets a fair share of the blame, but it's not ALL on him. If you're implying that Brady would've done better, I disagree.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Do7, post: 816362, member: 13398"] 1. So you're making my point that Rodgers would've thrived in that system, and based off how well that system is, combined with Rodgers skillset, and having a coach like Belichick, chances are Rodgers would do equally as well as opposed to Brady doing better than Rodgers here in GB. 2. Sure you were. For starters when you said players play harder for Brady as opposed to Rodgers. You have no way of proving that, as you would have to look into the hearts of each player. I'm certain those who play for Rodgers played just as hard as those for Brady, because both of those guys are capable of leading teams to victories, and you have a shot as long a they are on the field. Everyone leads differently. If you prefer Brady over Rodgers in regards of leadership that's fine. I prefer Brees personally so I won't argue with you there. 3. We've already established that McCarthy has a tendency to do questionable play calling decisions. So just because Rodgers changes the play every now and then, doesn't mean that he would be a total rebel with Belichick. With an OC like McDaniels calling plays, and playing into a system like NE's that helps create schemes to have receivers open, chances are Rodgers wouldn't have to free style. 4. Funny there's also leading by example, and considering Rodgers has played lights on more times than not, in which we've won the division and constantly making the post season outside these two years. As I told you earlier it takes leadership to lead your team down the field in order to win games, as well as comebacks. Again if you prefer Brady's leadership over Arodg, that is fine. That's personal preference. 5. I am tickled that you're trying to make an argument in regards to the AFC East not being a weak division, let alone compare it to our division which is tougher. How many times has that division produced more than one team making the post season in comparison to the NFCN? C'mon man. As for The Patriots record goes against NFC teams, yeah but timing is everything, and they only have to play those teams once. Take for instance, do you honestly believe The Patriots would have their way if they had to play in the NFC South, with Brees, Ryan, and Newton? The NFC North, with Rodgers, The Vikings defense, Chicago's defense? Or the time when Detroit was formidable? The NFC West with the LOB at their peak, or San Fran under the Harbaugh era? or The Rams now? How about Arizona when they were formidable? It's not saying much when typically in the AFC over the years you could win the division with 9-7. 6. I have showed evidence in which I have blatantly held Rodgers accountable. Don't even try it. Matter of fact I will bring up an example. So I have held Rodgers accountable when the situation calls for it. I have stated on multiple occasions that my issues with Rodgers this season is pertaining to his GAME, as he could play better. The difference between you and I is that you're making it seem as Rodgers is largely responsible for how the season went when he is just a part of it. I've never absolved him of any blame. All this stuff regarding up his leadership, throwing people under the bus (which he never has), no one was making a huge fuss prior to these past two years as it never was an issue as we've been making the post season and usually winning the division outside these past two years, and last year was due to injury. Rodgers was always the first to blame himself when things went wrong, whether it was or not. 7. I agree you that Rodgers can hold on to the ball too long, and some of the sacks are on him, but you and I both know that the Oline has failed protecting him which results in him scrambling. He gets a fair share of the blame, but it's not ALL on him. If you're implying that Brady would've done better, I disagree. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
pacmaniac
Latest posts
Questions that Define the Draft (2025)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 11:47 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Todd Princl
Yesterday at 7:49 PM
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Best FA in NFL History
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 7:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:46 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC Championship - Los Angeles Rams vs. New Orleans Saints
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
