Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
New Ownerships
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="weeds" data-source="post: 991868" data-attributes="member: 39"><p>"Inevitable" being the operative word here. Yeah, it's going to happen. There is way too much money at stake to prevent it. It can't be prevented. As I say, there is money to be made and aforementioned "ownership rules" are a stumbling block to the NFL accomplishing their ultimate goal of being an international entity. Rules are changed all of the time to accommodate the ability to churn out money to the already wealthy - an example would be the SCOTUS ruling in Citizen's United which essentially said that Corporations are "individuals" right, let's just break it down to it's most simple form? Which brings me to the next issue ... corporate ownerships would "fer shur" bring down the NFL's still tacit antitrust exemption. To my thinking, when I hear the term THE SHIELD affixed to the NFL - I think they're referring to their antitrust exemption, not the logo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="weeds, post: 991868, member: 39"] "Inevitable" being the operative word here. Yeah, it's going to happen. There is way too much money at stake to prevent it. It can't be prevented. As I say, there is money to be made and aforementioned "ownership rules" are a stumbling block to the NFL accomplishing their ultimate goal of being an international entity. Rules are changed all of the time to accommodate the ability to churn out money to the already wealthy - an example would be the SCOTUS ruling in Citizen's United which essentially said that Corporations are "individuals" right, let's just break it down to it's most simple form? Which brings me to the next issue ... corporate ownerships would "fer shur" bring down the NFL's still tacit antitrust exemption. To my thinking, when I hear the term THE SHIELD affixed to the NFL - I think they're referring to their antitrust exemption, not the logo. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Curly Calhoun
Latest posts
H
Packers Roster Assessment, 2025 Off-Season
Latest: Heyjoe4
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Heyjoe4
28 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
H
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: Heyjoe4
30 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 7:11 AM
Draft Talk
M
Aaron Banks - Guard Free Agent Signing 2025
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 11:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
New Ownerships
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top