Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike McCarthy's Future
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patriotplayer90" data-source="post: 744884" data-attributes="member: 11307"><p>Belichick is the only coach in the last 30 years to get the Browns to 11 wins. He still won 45 percent of his games with a completely inept Browns organization and no Brady and was despised and run out of town , compared to McCarthy winning 25 percent of his games with no Rodgers and still somehow viewed as a competent coach </p><p></p><p> If you have to dig that far into a coach's past to make a point, you are reaching. You are ignoring the fact that NE also had the #6 scoring defense during Brady's first year, a luxury they did not have the previous year. The following year, their defense was average and the wonder Boy couldn't do enough to take them to the playoffs. Then his next two SBs featured #1 and #2 defense. But somehow Brady is single-handedly responsible for his success, right? </p><p></p><p>If we are going to judge coaches by things which happened 20 years ago, why not give Mike Shanahan a call? He was really good then, so he must be now, right? The game has evolved, and Belichick is two steps ahead of everyone else and has proven that in recent seasons where he's had stints with backup QBs. McCarthy's act is stale, and it shows every time Rodgers goes down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patriotplayer90, post: 744884, member: 11307"] Belichick is the only coach in the last 30 years to get the Browns to 11 wins. He still won 45 percent of his games with a completely inept Browns organization and no Brady and was despised and run out of town , compared to McCarthy winning 25 percent of his games with no Rodgers and still somehow viewed as a competent coach If you have to dig that far into a coach's past to make a point, you are reaching. You are ignoring the fact that NE also had the #6 scoring defense during Brady's first year, a luxury they did not have the previous year. The following year, their defense was average and the wonder Boy couldn't do enough to take them to the playoffs. Then his next two SBs featured #1 and #2 defense. But somehow Brady is single-handedly responsible for his success, right? If we are going to judge coaches by things which happened 20 years ago, why not give Mike Shanahan a call? He was really good then, so he must be now, right? The game has evolved, and Belichick is two steps ahead of everyone else and has proven that in recent seasons where he's had stints with backup QBs. McCarthy's act is stale, and it shows every time Rodgers goes down. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
M
A Packers Mock Draft
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 10:34 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 3:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mike McCarthy's Future
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top