Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 978204" data-attributes="member: 17987">Perhaps "bust" is not the most accurate way of describing it. I guess it's the player vs. the pick. I wouldn't call Love (the player) a "bust" yet, but I do think that it's fair to say *the pick* has been a "bust" for the Green Bay Packers thus far. As before, there's still certainly the possibility that things do end up working out and he becomes a key player for us but that's not been the case thus far, of course. So call it whatever you want. Bust, flop, disappointment, wasted pick, etc. I'm not trying to get too particular about the verbiage but ultimately my point was that it's okay to simultaneously hold that starting a handful of games this season won't be enough to adequately assess whether or not we should pick up his option while also being of the opinion that the limited appearances he's had for us would thus far suggest the pick was a flop, bust, etc (Again, the pick, not the player. I think there's a distinction).</blockquote>

Total: 129 (members: 4, guests: 125)