Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 894766" data-attributes="member: 6578">I am not saying he solely runs deep routes, however he is a deep threat type receiver and NOT a possession type receiver. Hence why he should and is logically compared to other wide outs listed for perspective sake. I LITERALLY banged the drum all the days leading up to the draft and the days of the draft wanting a WR. I broke that down a TON. I was pissed we didn't get a potential solid #2 in the draft for that room - because we do not have one. I won't however allow that issue cloud my judgement of a player or inflate it either.MVS at BEST should be a team's #3 WR and about #5/#6 offensive weapon, unless he improves his hands and IMO route tree.</blockquote>

Total: 162 (members: 5, guests: 157)