Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lazard Situation...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 989373" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Good stuff.</p><p> let me guess he had exactly 100 targets? <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/whistling.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":whistling:" title="Whistling :whistling:" data-shortname=":whistling:" /> To be fair they should’ve brought that number to include a bigger sample size. He’s still a pretty good WR, but with the 38th most targets his yardage output was 39th and yards per game was 38th. Had he played every last game he still would not have broken 900 yards. I’m not implying he’s not good. I am saying he definitely didn’t “exceed”expectations as our primary target. I’ve got him as a lower end WR2 area which isn’t a slight by any means. I am being a little critical of him because he didn’t rise to the occasion. This was his stage to shine and he had the setup to have a 1,000 yard season.</p><p></p><p>That said. I do think he’s a good athlete and good teammate and he’s a excellent value for being undrafted. He’s also a A+ blocker and you and I have both recognized that plus. He actually deserves a $10m area deal and it wouldn’t shock me if someone surpasses that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 989373, member: 10086"] Good stuff. let me guess he had exactly 100 targets? :whistling: To be fair they should’ve brought that number to include a bigger sample size. He’s still a pretty good WR, but with the 38th most targets his yardage output was 39th and yards per game was 38th. Had he played every last game he still would not have broken 900 yards. I’m not implying he’s not good. I am saying he definitely didn’t “exceed”expectations as our primary target. I’ve got him as a lower end WR2 area which isn’t a slight by any means. I am being a little critical of him because he didn’t rise to the occasion. This was his stage to shine and he had the setup to have a 1,000 yard season. That said. I do think he’s a good athlete and good teammate and he’s a excellent value for being undrafted. He’s also a A+ blocker and you and I have both recognized that plus. He actually deserves a $10m area deal and it wouldn’t shock me if someone surpasses that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:55 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Draft Talk
Always Fun To Read These Stories
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:03 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 6:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lazard Situation...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top