Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 834563" data-attributes="member: 7261">I think we just disagree on how each of us view and would handle the situation.  In Jones's case, his cancer has not reached the locker room yet, but potentially could if the Packers say "OK, we have a player that isn't happy and wants to be traded/released, let's meet his needs".  To me that is the potential cancer that the Packers could create, allowing a player to tell the Packers what to do and infecting the locker room with that knowledge "if you aren't happy in Green Bay, we will help you find happiness by releasing you".  I would much rather see the Packers deliver the message of "You are under contract, we will decide your future until that contract is over."  If Jones shows up to mandatory camp and is a major distraction, then you dismiss him and put him on ice.Players like Dix and Sitton had already infected the locker room with a different kind of cancer, cutting it out was the Packers decision, not Sitton or Dix's.</blockquote>

Total: 90 (members: 2, guests: 88)