Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jaybadger82" data-source="post: 621726" data-attributes="member: 6211">Dumb conclusion without looking at it from a <a href="http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2015/09/giants_cut_veteran_wide_receiver_james_jones_repor.html" target="_blank">NYG perspective</a>: Jones wasn't going to leapfrog Beckham, Cruz and Randle on that depth chart.  With the deeper WR spots, the Giants preferred the youth and upside of guys like Davis and Washington.  Parker gives them a special teamer that returns kicks.  It just didn't make sense for them to hold onto Jones.  That doesn't mean he's washed up...Jones was the most productive Giants WR in the preseason.  His Raiders production was fine given the state of that offense.  His upside is obviously limited but he's a very sensible insurance policy beside relatively untested guys like Montgomery and Janis... Giving him a look is a no-brainer to me...</blockquote>

Total: 92 (members: 1, guests: 91)

Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Voyageur
- Today at 4:44 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Today at 3:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
A Packers Mock Draft
- Latest: Magooch
- Yesterday at 10:34 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
- Latest: gopkrs
- Yesterday at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk