Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
It’s now OFFICIAL!!! Rodgers has been traded to the Jets.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 999676" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Yes, I would say it is very normal. Virtually all great QB's, in their latter stages, have a preferred style of play that they either dictate completely (e.g. Peyton Manning) or integrate with the offense (e.g. Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan w/ Shanahan). It's just my opinion that it wasn't helpful, on balance, in this case. I don't believe that the way that Rodgers wants to play is the way to get the most out of the offense. </p><p></p><p>Here's why this conversation is so hard-- Rodgers is so polarizing as a character in the drama of the NFL that it's hard to say anything about his play, good or bad, without it being interpreted as a comment on his person. If I say "I think he exerted influence on the offensive design and it caused it to suffer," then it's inferred that I think he's a villain undermining the Packers. If you say "I think the offensive shift was more about personnel than preference," then it's inferred that you're a Rodgers homer who can't criticize him. </p><p></p><p>Hence, where we are in this thread. </p><p></p><p>Hopefully we can all agree that it's going to be fun seeing what LaFleur can do with Love in an offense that will be "all his."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 999676, member: 12283"] Yes, I would say it is very normal. Virtually all great QB's, in their latter stages, have a preferred style of play that they either dictate completely (e.g. Peyton Manning) or integrate with the offense (e.g. Aaron Rodgers, Matt Ryan w/ Shanahan). It's just my opinion that it wasn't helpful, on balance, in this case. I don't believe that the way that Rodgers wants to play is the way to get the most out of the offense. Here's why this conversation is so hard-- Rodgers is so polarizing as a character in the drama of the NFL that it's hard to say anything about his play, good or bad, without it being interpreted as a comment on his person. If I say "I think he exerted influence on the offensive design and it caused it to suffer," then it's inferred that I think he's a villain undermining the Packers. If you say "I think the offensive shift was more about personnel than preference," then it's inferred that you're a Rodgers homer who can't criticize him. Hence, where we are in this thread. Hopefully we can all agree that it's going to be fun seeing what LaFleur can do with Love in an offense that will be "all his." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
RRyder
Latest posts
M
Aaron Banks - Guard Free Agent Signing 2025
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 11:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 11:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Women's hockey 2024-25
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 11:25 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
S
2025 Packer Free Agent News/Tracker
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 9:39 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 7:21 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
It’s now OFFICIAL!!! Rodgers has been traded to the Jets.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top