Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 991533" data-attributes="member: 4199"><p>The future draft picks are generally considered lower value by most of the league. Even if you disagree with the premise that "next year is worth less," surely you <em>can </em>agree that the Jets are likely to win more games with Rodgers, ergo, each pick is likely to be later in each round, yes? And in such a situation, those picks will be worth less (not worthless) because they are later in each round? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, I'll admit I know little of Ruckert, but by your own words, he didn't play at all last year due to injury. Where is he in his recovery? Has he even begun rehab? Unknown Value.</p><p></p><p>Mims by most observations is terrible. Why were the Jets willing to move on from him? It seems more likely he'd be cut by the Jets. IMHO, 0 value in trade.</p><p></p><p>Clemons has some value to me, he produced something at this level. And one can never have enough pass rushers, but 5th round no. 4 EDGE players are somewhat plentiful. If he can play special teams, sure, I'd want him. You'd get him for only 3 years vs. 4 as a rookie, so I'd value him approximately where he was drafted minus a little bit.</p><p></p><p>That's my ballpark math.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see why we couldn't get that kind of offer in addition to picks. Though if we're accepting players, I'd hope to get a starter or someone the Packers actually want/graded highly when they came out. Assuming the Packers had graded Ruckert and Mims highly or favorably relative to whatever metric they use, sure, whatever, try to work them into the deal. But I would not add them in, trying to bargain bin dig.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I'm not terribly worried about the cap hit. If we're tight as a result of that hit someday, we'd likely cut some aging vets that are approaching the end of their second contract. The young core would survive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mradtke66, post: 991533, member: 4199"] The future draft picks are generally considered lower value by most of the league. Even if you disagree with the premise that "next year is worth less," surely you [I]can [/I]agree that the Jets are likely to win more games with Rodgers, ergo, each pick is likely to be later in each round, yes? And in such a situation, those picks will be worth less (not worthless) because they are later in each round? Sure, I'll admit I know little of Ruckert, but by your own words, he didn't play at all last year due to injury. Where is he in his recovery? Has he even begun rehab? Unknown Value. Mims by most observations is terrible. Why were the Jets willing to move on from him? It seems more likely he'd be cut by the Jets. IMHO, 0 value in trade. Clemons has some value to me, he produced something at this level. And one can never have enough pass rushers, but 5th round no. 4 EDGE players are somewhat plentiful. If he can play special teams, sure, I'd want him. You'd get him for only 3 years vs. 4 as a rookie, so I'd value him approximately where he was drafted minus a little bit. That's my ballpark math. I don't see why we couldn't get that kind of offer in addition to picks. Though if we're accepting players, I'd hope to get a starter or someone the Packers actually want/graded highly when they came out. Assuming the Packers had graded Ruckert and Mims highly or favorably relative to whatever metric they use, sure, whatever, try to work them into the deal. But I would not add them in, trying to bargain bin dig. Again, I'm not terribly worried about the cap hit. If we're tight as a result of that hit someday, we'd likely cut some aging vets that are approaching the end of their second contract. The young core would survive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Golfczar
shockerx
Latest posts
Idea For An Exercise...but need your input!
Latest: gopkrs
29 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Heard a Trey rumor....
Latest: tynimiller
42 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 mock draft probably the only one I'll post this year
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:51 PM
Draft Talk
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 3:37 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Todd Princl
Today at 2:55 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
