Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 989601" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Half would be a lot more reasonable. </p><p></p><p>What would half be? </p><p></p><p>Here's some rough math:</p><p></p><p>Average 1st round pick (this year): 1000 points</p><p>Average 1st round pick (a year out): 500 points</p><p>Average 2nd round pick (this year): 430 points</p><p>Average 2nd round pick (a year out): 215 points</p><p>Former 1st round player (Fant): Valued at a 2nd; 430 points</p><p>Veteran on reasonable contract (Harris): Valued at a 5th; 30 points</p><p>Rookie contract QB to compete to start: Valued at a 5th; 30 points</p><p></p><p>Total: 2635 in draft chart point value</p><p></p><p>That equates to the 2nd overall pick. Pick #13 is worth 1150, which leaves 1485 left over to account for. That pick next year is worth roughly 600, which leaves 885. </p><p></p><p>So two 1st round picks would actually be less than half of the package that the Seahawks got. </p><p></p><p>It also seems weird to me to imagine a scenario in which a team views Rodgers as the missing link in a Super Bowl run, but also doesn't value him enough to trade real capital. The only way I could envision that unfolding is if there was only one team interested and they didn't have to compete.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 989601, member: 12283"] Half would be a lot more reasonable. What would half be? Here's some rough math: Average 1st round pick (this year): 1000 points Average 1st round pick (a year out): 500 points Average 2nd round pick (this year): 430 points Average 2nd round pick (a year out): 215 points Former 1st round player (Fant): Valued at a 2nd; 430 points Veteran on reasonable contract (Harris): Valued at a 5th; 30 points Rookie contract QB to compete to start: Valued at a 5th; 30 points Total: 2635 in draft chart point value That equates to the 2nd overall pick. Pick #13 is worth 1150, which leaves 1485 left over to account for. That pick next year is worth roughly 600, which leaves 885. So two 1st round picks would actually be less than half of the package that the Seahawks got. It also seems weird to me to imagine a scenario in which a team views Rodgers as the missing link in a Super Bowl run, but also doesn't value him enough to trade real capital. The only way I could envision that unfolding is if there was only one team interested and they didn't have to compete. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Latest posts
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
Latest: Todd Princl
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:26 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: Dantés
Yesterday at 9:20 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
