Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Krabs" data-source="post: 989556" data-attributes="member: 15739"><p>The Broncos laid an egg on that one. Just because one team does that does not set any sort of market. Each team will evaluate their needs and adjust accordingly. Like I said, I agree with most of what you said. I just don't agree that they will get any sort of significant value for Rodgers. One big difference is that with Wilson the contract he was carrying was lower. They went into it and gave him a new contract. Rodgers already has a gigantic contract for multiple seasons yet. It's hard to marry that up. I get it too that they could renegotiate once he in theory would be traded. With Wilson the Broncos were looking long term. With Rodgers teams know he has a year or two left. It's not long term and they are not going to give that sort of value for him. We are just not going to see eye to eye on this one. The most I see is a 2nd rounder and maybe a middling TE or something. It's all speculation anyway. All I know is if I were sitting in a GM's chair I wouldn't give a lot for him.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 98 (members: 1, guests: 97)

Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Draft Talk
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
- Latest: Todd Princl
- Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Draft Talk
R
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: rmontro
- Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Draft Clusters
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 9:26 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
- Latest: Dantés
- Yesterday at 9:20 PM
Draft Talk