Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 837316" data-attributes="member: 9033">To be fair, I'm not far off from preferring Mack over those four guys you mention. I mean, Mack is a better pass rusher (by leaps and bounds) than either of the Smiths (and only costs $7 mil/year more than Zadarius). Savage and Gary might be good (though my money is far more on Savage than Gary) but certainly not up to the level of a DPoY candidate. Packers, with Mack, would be a different team where we'd have to project how the rest is filled out but they certainly would NOT be in a position where they're forced to re-sign Perry. You replace the Smith's contracts with Mack's and the team has $6mil/yr to spend, that wouldn't get an elite guy (or even above average) but it's not chump change.The big negative to having that one elite player is, as you point out, the injury risk, but that's true for LOTS of positions. I mean, what happened to the packers when Rodgers got hurt? But nobody is going to argue about preferring a mediocre QB with more good players elsewhere.</blockquote>

Total: 115 (members: 3, guests: 112)