Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
improved defence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 627908" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>and there is no doubt what Hawk was last year, we all saw it, but then again, the Packers have been poor against the run and on Defense in General prior to the first 4 games in which Hawk was mostly replaced. There were 20 other things that happened too. The playbook was simplified, our best defensive player switched positions. We had numerous personel changes, we've gotten better all the way around, but an author would have us believe it was because we ran our defense around a Declining players skill set? Maybe it was the fact that Pickett couldn't do any more than stand in one spot on defense and he was one of our better D-linemen? So they made their jobs easy, keep linemen off linebackers, which by they way is a completely foreign and radical concept for a defense????</p><p></p><p>You can say it's in stark contrast to my view, but it kind of says EXACTLY what i said. He couldn't move. He wasn't making plays. He didn't stand pat and disengage and make plays. He eat up a gap, kind of and with 2 other guys that didn't really do a very good job either.</p><p></p><p>and his 2013 assessment is exactly what it was of Picket, His range has decreased, so he can hold a point. What were they asking him to do? exactly. It wasn't because they wanted to run the defense around Hawk, it was because he couldn't do what they really wanted him to. But hey, let's blame it on Hawk. Hawk had to play next to Jones, let's blame it on Hawk. We've had a merry go round of injuries at DL and linebacker, let's blame it on hawk. </p><p></p><p>for all you saying last year was enough, yes, that much was obvious. Do you really think i'm saying it wasn't despite my numerous times saying exactly that?, last year was obvious Hawk was done. That should clear up any misconceptions...Hopefully. If Ginny wants to say Hawk was the weak point in 4 games last year, fine, but then we weren't running nascar defenses after week for either and a lot of other things changed. Again, ,no doubt Hawk had diminished, but I find his "findings" to be exactly as I said earlier is disingenuous at best.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 627908, member: 10441"] and there is no doubt what Hawk was last year, we all saw it, but then again, the Packers have been poor against the run and on Defense in General prior to the first 4 games in which Hawk was mostly replaced. There were 20 other things that happened too. The playbook was simplified, our best defensive player switched positions. We had numerous personel changes, we've gotten better all the way around, but an author would have us believe it was because we ran our defense around a Declining players skill set? Maybe it was the fact that Pickett couldn't do any more than stand in one spot on defense and he was one of our better D-linemen? So they made their jobs easy, keep linemen off linebackers, which by they way is a completely foreign and radical concept for a defense???? You can say it's in stark contrast to my view, but it kind of says EXACTLY what i said. He couldn't move. He wasn't making plays. He didn't stand pat and disengage and make plays. He eat up a gap, kind of and with 2 other guys that didn't really do a very good job either. and his 2013 assessment is exactly what it was of Picket, His range has decreased, so he can hold a point. What were they asking him to do? exactly. It wasn't because they wanted to run the defense around Hawk, it was because he couldn't do what they really wanted him to. But hey, let's blame it on Hawk. Hawk had to play next to Jones, let's blame it on Hawk. We've had a merry go round of injuries at DL and linebacker, let's blame it on hawk. for all you saying last year was enough, yes, that much was obvious. Do you really think i'm saying it wasn't despite my numerous times saying exactly that?, last year was obvious Hawk was done. That should clear up any misconceptions...Hopefully. If Ginny wants to say Hawk was the weak point in 4 games last year, fine, but then we weren't running nascar defenses after week for either and a lot of other things changed. Again, ,no doubt Hawk had diminished, but I find his "findings" to be exactly as I said earlier is disingenuous at best. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
rmontro
Latest posts
H
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Heyjoe4
53 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Stock Sale
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brewers 2025!
Latest: weeds
Today at 12:23 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: DoURant
Today at 11:11 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
improved defence
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
