Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Hypothetical Rodgers trade with the Raiders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 905650" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Not saying this to dispute your post, just as a casual observation.</p><p>That’s the thing. It doesn’t look like we should be overly concerned with “declining” Rodgers (this season for sure) after watching him shred teams left n right. Had we been slightly more healthy at O-Line, we were very close to being the best team out there. Arguably the best at Offense anyway.</p><p>Only Time will tell, but Aaron Rodgers clearly has several good years in his tires and there’s an outside chance he could play well into his early 40’s.</p><p></p><p>. Obviously teams’ draft needs change season to season, that’s one argument.</p><p>I don’t see a QB being a year in the Packers system as being a negative like you and some others do. IMO, That in itself wouldn’t detract from his value as if 1 years training camp and practice detracts from future success. If anything it’s a + to Love’s value.</p><p></p><p>The point being, people who argue that popular “never taken a snap” concept always seem to do it rhetorically. Which college QB being drafted has played even 1 snap in the NFL? That’s another rhetorical question just to make a point. They’re all a gamble.</p><p>Unless you can explain in detail why he’s less valuable than any other college athlete being drafted I don’t get that argument. The only offset I can think of is he’s 1 year older and 1 less year Rookie contract</p><p></p><p>Also, it may be highly unlikely he’d get the EXACT value at #26 or whatever. But it’s not like at all unlikely we couldn’t get a late day 1 selection or even early day 2 selection (to accommodate 1 lost year of contract). I’d be completely ok with #33-#40 overall.. anything beyond that I’d gamble and keep him as my #2, who knows he might be the next Aaron Rodgers! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/whistling.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":whistling:" title="Whistling :whistling:" data-shortname=":whistling:" /></p><p></p><p>PS. </p><p>Mel Kizer had him going #24 overall</p><p>Matt Miller had him #13 overall</p><p>Jeremiah had Love going to the Colts at #13 overall “because he might need to sit 1 year”</p><p>Doug Farrer had him #23 overall </p><p>Will Brinson had him #20 to Jacksonville. </p><p>The general consensus was 1st rounder. </p><p>Many more had Love top 15-20 overall</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 905650, member: 10086"] Not saying this to dispute your post, just as a casual observation. That’s the thing. It doesn’t look like we should be overly concerned with “declining” Rodgers (this season for sure) after watching him shred teams left n right. Had we been slightly more healthy at O-Line, we were very close to being the best team out there. Arguably the best at Offense anyway. Only Time will tell, but Aaron Rodgers clearly has several good years in his tires and there’s an outside chance he could play well into his early 40’s. . Obviously teams’ draft needs change season to season, that’s one argument. I don’t see a QB being a year in the Packers system as being a negative like you and some others do. IMO, That in itself wouldn’t detract from his value as if 1 years training camp and practice detracts from future success. If anything it’s a + to Love’s value. The point being, people who argue that popular “never taken a snap” concept always seem to do it rhetorically. Which college QB being drafted has played even 1 snap in the NFL? That’s another rhetorical question just to make a point. They’re all a gamble. Unless you can explain in detail why he’s less valuable than any other college athlete being drafted I don’t get that argument. The only offset I can think of is he’s 1 year older and 1 less year Rookie contract Also, it may be highly unlikely he’d get the EXACT value at #26 or whatever. But it’s not like at all unlikely we couldn’t get a late day 1 selection or even early day 2 selection (to accommodate 1 lost year of contract). I’d be completely ok with #33-#40 overall.. anything beyond that I’d gamble and keep him as my #2, who knows he might be the next Aaron Rodgers! :whistling: PS. Mel Kizer had him going #24 overall Matt Miller had him #13 overall Jeremiah had Love going to the Colts at #13 overall “because he might need to sit 1 year” Doug Farrer had him #23 overall Will Brinson had him #20 to Jacksonville. The general consensus was 1st rounder. Many more had Love top 15-20 overall [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Curly Calhoun
SudsMcBucky
Latest posts
Fifth Year Option Decided On Wyatt - another year added...
Latest: SudsMcBucky
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
My Brush With Greatness
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:05 AM
NFL Discussions
H
Final Thoughts on 2025 Draft
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:03 AM
Draft Talk
P
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: Pugger
Today at 8:00 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 11:50 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Hypothetical Rodgers trade with the Raiders
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
