Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 730547" data-attributes="member: 7261">Or here is a novel concept......sign a veteran FA QB to back up #12?  I know that TT is in love with the idea of drafting/developing QB's and making something out of them, but for what purpose?  They normally aren't ready for 2-3 years, so having them as your #2 is risky at best if AR goes down.  If they do amount to something in the next 4 years, do you force AR to retire?  I will be the first to admit, when the Packers drafted AR, I was scratching my head, but I think TT had a pretty good feel for just how much longer Favre was going to be a Packer and he had a great prospect fall to him in the draft.  But once Hundley is done, I would much rather see the Packers spend a bit more of the cap on a proven Veteran QB to backup #12, then just keep developing guys that probably aren't ready to play and not worth a whole lot as trade bait.  Maybe in 4 years, revisit finding AR's predecessor.Edit after some thought:Or....if Hundley would be content being the #2 behind AR, let him shop the FA market and if he isn't overpriced, bring him back.  At this point, I doubt any team is going to promise him the #1 job and as a FA, he is going to go where the money is the highest as well as the opportunity to start.  Which may factor him right out of GB.</blockquote>

Total: 110 (members: 1, guests: 109)