Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 690076" data-attributes="member: 4199">I favor staying in the 3-4 because we'd have to replace fewer parts.  Re-sign Perry, which should probably be done regardless, and the front 7 has at least adequate players everywhere--assuming Guion-Clark-Daniels upfront, Perry, Ryan, Martinez, Matthew at linebacker.  Any pick in the front 7 that bumps one of those guys from the starting lineup to backup/situational player makes the defense better.To go to 4-3, we'd start the off-season as (hole), Clark, Daniels, Perry up front and (hole), Ryan, Martinez at linebacker.  To cobble something together, we could use Matthews as the SLB and Lowry/Datone as the strong DE, but neither has shown anything in such a role.  Going to nickel, the front 4 would probably be Matthews and Perry at DE, Daniels as one of the DTs.  Clark for nickel, but we'd have to find someone for dime DT to replace Clark.  What are gaining by switching to a 4-3 again?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 86 (members: 0, guests: 86)

Badger Volleyball 2025-26
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
M
A Packers Mock Draft
- Latest: Magooch
- Yesterday at 10:34 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
- Latest: gopkrs
- Yesterday at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
- Latest: Thirteen Below
- Yesterday at 3:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum