Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 710060" data-attributes="member: 10086">I agree with your assertion that he should be (and I believe he will be) signed to a modest contract that will not considerably affect our pocket book.   I think it makes sense because one considerable benefit is we can concentrate on more pressing needs.  We need to prioritize resigning our Defensive FA group and then injecting a few playmakers that can have an impact in 2017 pass coverage. I know it would be a statistical anomaly, but I feel it would be very wise this year to infuse a proven veteran CB from FA on a short term deal. This would take pressure off us needing to spend a #1 or #2 CB selection,  unless it's an obvious choice of best available talent.</blockquote>

Total: 109 (members: 2, guests: 107)