Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 710039" data-attributes="member: 7261">While I get that thinking now, I don't really think anyone, including the Packers were viewing Monty and especially Cobb, as an every week RB back in September.  I am guessing their logic was, if #1 (Lacy) or #2 (Starks) go down, we fill it with a PS guy.  This was obvious when they started scrambling trying to find RB's and just happened to discover that Monty could actually fill the role.I don't know what the plans are for 2017, but I hope they don't view Cobb as their #3 RB and go into the season with just Monty and whoever.</blockquote>

Total: 107 (members: 2, guests: 105)