Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 779486" data-attributes="member: 9033">Yes, it would have been. However, the Pats just lost 41-33 against the Eagles. The Falcons lost 34-28 the year before. The Packers defense, as I've mentioned, was terrible the past two years due to awful injury luck and, eventually, Capers just needed to go to give everyone else a chance to start over. But the narrative about the Packers' defense being "average or worse" every year under Capers is just plain wrong. They've had some spectacular failures, yes, but so do most teams that lose in the playoffs, that's why they lose. Every year there is only one fanbase that's happy with their team's offense and defense. As great as the Packers offense is, how come they can't score more than 20 points against the Cardinals in 2015 but the freaking Panthers can put up 49!!!! I know, you're gonna point out that the Cards turned the ball over 7 times in that game (and that's huge) but the Packers' defense got two turnovers against the Cards and the Packers' offense is (supposedly) much better than the Panthers'. The 2014 Packers lost to Seattle because MM cost his team home field advantage and coached scared (the Packers defense gave up exactly TWO more points than the Patriots gave up against the Seahawks in the Super Bowl).</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 135 (members: 0, guests: 135)