Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Honest positional needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 812070" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>This would be my opinion:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>QB (1): </strong>They should add a mid to late round talent to the competition behind Rodgers.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>RB (1): </strong>They should add a mid to late round talent to the mix with Jones and Williams.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>WR (1): </strong>They need to add a slot/YAC weapon to replace Cobb. A free agent makes the most sense, as they have a ton of youth in the WR corps as it is. Shouldn't need to be a blockbuster contract.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>TE (2): </strong>They should sign an affordable veteran who can block and draft a player to compete with Tonyan and develop into the future receiving role.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>OT (1): </strong>They need to draft a future starter at RT, as high as their first pick, value allowing.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>OG (1): </strong>They need to draft a future starter at RG, as high as the 2nd day, value allowing.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>DL (1): </strong>They should be looking for a 3T/5T versatile player to develop being Mike Daniels. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>OLB (2-3): </strong>You figure that Fackrell and Gilbert are back and maybe Perry is they don't want to eat the dead money; they need to at least sign a solid veteran to contribute snaps plus draft a future starter relatively high. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>ILB (1): </strong>I would assume that Martinez and Burks are the planned starters moving forward; a mid round pick on a key backup makes sense.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>CB (0): </strong>As long as they bring back a veteran like Breeland or Williams, I see no reason to make further investment here.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>S (2): </strong>This is another sign and draft situation. They should bring in a veteran who can start immediately, and draft somewhere in the upper to middle rounds for more help.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>K (1): </strong>Cut Crosby and draft someone later.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>P (0)</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>LS (0)</strong></li> </ul><p>So on the whole, you're looking at 14-15 total players, with maybe 5-6 being high priority (i.e. sign someone who is ready to go now, or spend a pick in the first two days). Certainly that's plenty of work, but that's not exactly a complete rebuild in this league either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 812070, member: 12283"] This would be my opinion: [LIST] [*][B]QB (1): [/B]They should add a mid to late round talent to the competition behind Rodgers. [*][B]RB (1): [/B]They should add a mid to late round talent to the mix with Jones and Williams. [*][B]WR (1): [/B]They need to add a slot/YAC weapon to replace Cobb. A free agent makes the most sense, as they have a ton of youth in the WR corps as it is. Shouldn't need to be a blockbuster contract. [*][B]TE (2): [/B]They should sign an affordable veteran who can block and draft a player to compete with Tonyan and develop into the future receiving role. [*][B]OT (1): [/B]They need to draft a future starter at RT, as high as their first pick, value allowing. [*][B]OG (1): [/B]They need to draft a future starter at RG, as high as the 2nd day, value allowing. [*][B]DL (1): [/B]They should be looking for a 3T/5T versatile player to develop being Mike Daniels. [*][B]OLB (2-3): [/B]You figure that Fackrell and Gilbert are back and maybe Perry is they don't want to eat the dead money; they need to at least sign a solid veteran to contribute snaps plus draft a future starter relatively high. [*][B]ILB (1): [/B]I would assume that Martinez and Burks are the planned starters moving forward; a mid round pick on a key backup makes sense. [*][B]CB (0): [/B]As long as they bring back a veteran like Breeland or Williams, I see no reason to make further investment here. [*][B]S (2): [/B]This is another sign and draft situation. They should bring in a veteran who can start immediately, and draft somewhere in the upper to middle rounds for more help. [*][B]K (1): [/B]Cut Crosby and draft someone later. [*][B]P (0)[/B] [*][B]LS (0)[/B] [/LIST] So on the whole, you're looking at 14-15 total players, with maybe 5-6 being high priority (i.e. sign someone who is ready to go now, or spend a pick in the first two days). Certainly that's plenty of work, but that's not exactly a complete rebuild in this league either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: OldSchool101
12 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Thirteen Below
30 minutes ago
Draft Talk
R
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:27 PM
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
S
Who Plans on Attending the Draft?
Latest: Schultz
Today at 8:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lazard Situation...
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 8:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Honest positional needs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
