Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency: Packers Should Green Bay Pursue?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 869200" data-attributes="member: 13032"><p>I see your point. That’s part of the problem drafting so late in the first round. Even in a draft that is stocked at a position (in this case WR), it’s possible that 5 or 6 guys are taken first. I don’t think it’s wise to take a 2nd or 3rd round talent in the first round just because there is a need. Drafting Taylor under these circumstances, or as you say, BPA, is a reasonable way to address the pick. It certainly does solve a problem.</p><p></p><p>And we still don’t know what will happen with the glut of WRs still on the FA market. Because the draft is heavy on WRs, the position isn’t in great demand in FA. As the draft gets closer, and FA wears on, and these FAs remain on the market, their price will only go down. So if GB can get a guy like Perriman on the cheap, I’d be all for using #30 on someone other than a WR. And a RB may make sense. And Taylor really upped his receiving skills last year and would be valuable on jet screens, bubble screens, or even out of the slot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heyjoe4, post: 869200, member: 13032"] I see your point. That’s part of the problem drafting so late in the first round. Even in a draft that is stocked at a position (in this case WR), it’s possible that 5 or 6 guys are taken first. I don’t think it’s wise to take a 2nd or 3rd round talent in the first round just because there is a need. Drafting Taylor under these circumstances, or as you say, BPA, is a reasonable way to address the pick. It certainly does solve a problem. And we still don’t know what will happen with the glut of WRs still on the FA market. Because the draft is heavy on WRs, the position isn’t in great demand in FA. As the draft gets closer, and FA wears on, and these FAs remain on the market, their price will only go down. So if GB can get a guy like Perriman on the cheap, I’d be all for using #30 on someone other than a WR. And a RB may make sense. And Taylor really upped his receiving skills last year and would be valuable on jet screens, bubble screens, or even out of the slot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
H
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:12 AM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
H
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:06 AM
Draft Talk
H
Prospects that I'm very bullish on...
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:03 AM
Draft Talk
R
2025 mock draft probably the only one I'll post this year
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 12:09 AM
Draft Talk
Idea For An Exercise...but need your input!
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 7:55 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency: Packers Should Green Bay Pursue?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top