Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency: Packers Should Green Bay Pursue?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RRyder" data-source="post: 867144" data-attributes="member: 10329"><p>1: The question at hand is in regards to current Rodgers. Not the Rodgers that played with any of those players. Its literally impossible to answer the question of who has gone on to be better without him. And it's not even what I said or alluded to. I've quite literally said that that a player making as much as Rodgers NEEDS to be able to cover holes for the obvious reason that cap spent on one position means it cant be spent somewhere else</p><p></p><p>2: Can you point to where I said that bolded part?</p><p></p><p>3: Once again. I'm saying with Rodgers cap number he needs to elevate others play. Not being able to do that with his cap number makes for a valid criticism. </p><p></p><p>I'm trying to make this clear because apparently it seems any criticism on my part is being misconstrued. (evidence by people going down a road that I never even alluded to)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RRyder, post: 867144, member: 10329"] 1: The question at hand is in regards to current Rodgers. Not the Rodgers that played with any of those players. Its literally impossible to answer the question of who has gone on to be better without him. And it's not even what I said or alluded to. I've quite literally said that that a player making as much as Rodgers NEEDS to be able to cover holes for the obvious reason that cap spent on one position means it cant be spent somewhere else 2: Can you point to where I said that bolded part? 3: Once again. I'm saying with Rodgers cap number he needs to elevate others play. Not being able to do that with his cap number makes for a valid criticism. I'm trying to make this clear because apparently it seems any criticism on my part is being misconstrued. (evidence by people going down a road that I never even alluded to) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:54 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
M
A Packers Mock Draft
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 10:34 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft Prospects for Packers
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 4:17 PM
Draft Talk
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:58 PM
Draft Talk
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 3:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency: Packers Should Green Bay Pursue?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top