Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1060539" data-attributes="member: 10086">I liked what Ted did in Day1 and I didn’t like what Ted did in Day1.Imo The trade back to #33 for the #1 selection in Day 2 and #1 pick in Day3 was 200% along the correct thought process of betting on self ability for key strategic purposes. I disagreed on losing a potential 5th year option but that’s just me. Forget about the actual picks for a second (Kevin King and then Biegel from the Badgers). As a general rule a players ranked at 23 and 27 are not some far cry. Often your ideal player doesn’t even get selected in a backup if you know your trade back partners intention. It leaves 3 intriguing draft prospects susceptible to being plucked. Likely 1-2 don’t even get selected. Who would’ve guess GB selects Quay Walker??  Teams do weird stuff.Now in Day 1 at pick #12 or #14 overall that’s another story. Those are potential top 10 prospects that slide across our selection. For me I’d rather move up a spot or two there. So that philosophy changes in each draft and each order placement. In this draft? I like having an extra 3rd Round equity to manipulate the Board.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 72 (members: 1, guests: 71)