Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scotland Yard" data-source="post: 805873" data-attributes="member: 5934">I never called it a "bribe", so don't know what that has to do with it.Murphy was the CEO, not Brandt. Brandt was operating under the authority of Murphy, so that is also a moot point you make.As far as Favre's camp spinning it later on, O.K. However, it is still the naive Murphy who put himself and the organization into a position to be made to look foolish. Murphy just isn't savvy enough IMO to be running a business in the public eye like the Packers.Finally, if it is such a great idea to pay players to retire instead of letting them go play elsewhere via trade or FA, why is it that I cannot recall ever seeing this stupid idea done by another NFL team? I mean who does that? "Here's $20 million if you'll just stay retired...pretty please with sugar on top". Dumb. (And I was very PO'ed at Favre back then about this whole situation, not at all in his camp, but, the Packers (Murphy) handled it like a clown squad.)</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 53 (members: 0, guests: 53)