Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 878669" data-attributes="member: 10086">I said novice fans OR Coaches.. the connector “OR” means one, the other or both, not all only both jusf for mathematical purposes, but you other sentential logic posters can check me on that <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />Listen, you can complain all you want, but number one it doesn’t look good and expect to be humbled when GB doesn’t have a #2 WR finishing at 480 yards. You complainers make it sound like we got significantly worse, so I guess we can expect 380 yards for our #2 WR this season? Actually I like our chances. That’s why I’ve been defending this crop. That’s also coming from me, who guessed we should go after Tee Higgins in a trade back. But I’m realistic, he’s not going to single handily take us to a SB either and I’m wise enough to temper my expectations even though we didn’t select one on the draft (we did in FA). I do agree in general that the later the round the bigger the hill, but no they’re not, TWO Packer WR are 2nd round draft selections. You forgot about EQ. He only played his Rookie season (but he has the benefit of 3 offseason programs) Nithing wrong with wanting a player to get drafted to bolster a position, I was in that group myself. But as we come to the reality we see the bigger picture.1. Begelton is likely better than Shepherd and he was signed late last season. At the very least he’s good on ST which Shepherd wasn’t and he also catches everything thrown his way (so to speak) which Shepherd or Moore also didn’t. Begelton is the antithesis of Moore/Shepherd who competed for #6. He’s both good at ST and has a high catch rate (which totally transitions to the NFL from CFL).2. Funchess was brought in to bolster the group with a veteran presence. He is more NFL proven than anyone not named Adams and he wasn’t evenin the WR group last season3. Lazard finished the year strong and is poised to get more reps and improve his game.4. EQ didn’t play regular season 2019 and showed promise his 2018 Rookie season. He has also been praised by Rodgers and should benefit from 3 offseason programs, so you can discount me on that.. ... but you’re also discounting our QB’s opinion as well.5.  While MVS is somewhat speculative, his speed/measurables are clearly NFL grade. It’s actually pleasing to say this season he’s in that #5-#6  range verses last year more the #3-4 range. He’s got stiff competition this season and he best bring his A game day 1.The beauty of this is unlike what Captain snd several  others are portraying, we don’t need all 5 guys behind Adams to improve drastically. We need 1 guy not named Adams to shine. A slight improvement from any others is just a bonus.  If we can get 2250+ from our top 3 WR were in good shape. If we can get 2500+ there’s going to be some serious backpedaling going on in here and I won’t say I told you so once, I don’t need to, I’m saying I told you so now. If we finish below 2,000 yards (roughly our 2019 finish)  for our top 3?  I’ll crawl in a hole and throw up and probably be *****ing with everyone else by seasons end.</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 62 (members: 0, guests: 62)

Latest posts

Top 30 Visits 2025
- Latest: DoURant
- Today at 4:47 PM
Draft Talk
I remember this place.
- Latest: milani
- Today at 3:59 PM
The Green Bay Life
The 80th Annual Amish Mafia Draft Contest
- Latest: PikeBadger
- Today at 3:37 PM
Draft Talk
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
- Latest: tynimiller
- Today at 12:09 PM
Draft Talk
Should the Packers Start Revoking Season Tickets?
- Latest: El Guapo
- Today at 11:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum