Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Do7" data-source="post: 823964" data-attributes="member: 13398">Again I'm aware that it wasn't popular. Again I simply thought that the addition of Mack, and how he would affect the defense as a whole would've been worth the risk. Plus he's definitely the kind of player I think most people would consider Packer Material. Again I understand, I just think it's just a risk I think that would've benefited us. Now when I'm saying this [USER=11289]@swhitset[/USER] I believe I understand the lottery example a little better now, but I still wouldn't relate these two as the same. As we know what we're getting with Mack right?</blockquote>

Total: 102 (members: 3, guests: 99)