Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AmishMafia" data-source="post: 613414" data-attributes="member: 2846">Good ****ing grief.   Really?  Where is this Viking talent I keep hearing about?  The Vikings went 7-9 with their preferred QB and they are somehow better?  DBs, LBs, DL, OL, RBs, WRs, TEs, QBs.  Which position group on the Vikings is better than the Packers?TE is the only group the Vikings may be better than the Packers.  Even RB.   Peterson is 30 years old.  I do not trade Lacy for AP.  Lacy is young and still on the rise - Peterson is going to have age catch up on him sooner rather than later.   DL?  maybe a bit.But our LBs and DBs are better.  Our OL and WRs are better.I think if the Packers picked up the entire Viking roster on waivers, maybe 5 or 4 are able to start out of 22.</blockquote>

Total: 117 (members: 1, guests: 116)