Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do Packers have more injuries than other teams?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rmontro" data-source="post: 739598" data-attributes="member: 12340"><p>Obviously there's a lot of disagreement on whether GB gets hit harder by injuries than other teams. But Colin Cowherd today gave an explanation for it that I have never heard before. Now he may be full of baloney, but I'd never heard this theory before:</p><p></p><p>One of his favorite themes to talk about is how the Packers are an average roster with a great quarterback. And I do think he is right about that, without Rodgers the Packers are an average team, at best. He noted that the Packers are always banged up, always hurt. His explanation was that the Packers don't have a very athletic roster. In other words, if you look at great athletes like LeBron James, they tend not to be injured much. In part, because they are so physically gifted, they are exceptional physical specimens. He's saying that the Packers don't have these types, and that's why they get hurt so much.</p><p></p><p>It's strange how we will go into a season thin at a certain area (last year corner, this year OL), and sure enough that area seems to be the one that gets hit the hardest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rmontro, post: 739598, member: 12340"] Obviously there's a lot of disagreement on whether GB gets hit harder by injuries than other teams. But Colin Cowherd today gave an explanation for it that I have never heard before. Now he may be full of baloney, but I'd never heard this theory before: One of his favorite themes to talk about is how the Packers are an average roster with a great quarterback. And I do think he is right about that, without Rodgers the Packers are an average team, at best. He noted that the Packers are always banged up, always hurt. His explanation was that the Packers don't have a very athletic roster. In other words, if you look at great athletes like LeBron James, they tend not to be injured much. In part, because they are so physically gifted, they are exceptional physical specimens. He's saying that the Packers don't have these types, and that's why they get hurt so much. It's strange how we will go into a season thin at a certain area (last year corner, this year OL), and sure enough that area seems to be the one that gets hit the hardest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
G
griffin
Administrator
Members online
Team Ronny
PackerDNA
griffin
DoURant
Latest posts
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 4:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Stock Sale
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
New Proposed Kick-Off Rule
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brewers 2025!
Latest: weeds
Today at 12:23 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: DoURant
Today at 11:11 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Do Packers have more injuries than other teams?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top