Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Divisional round: Seattle at Green Bay - payback time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 859299" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>By this definition you lose because your distorting the rule. MD <strong>WAS</strong> the receiver at the point he caught it with both hands past the goal line.</p><p></p><p>The GB player was the only player with clear cut possession and he had possession <strong>first</strong> (becomes a <strong>receiver</strong>) (both hands firmly on ball, no bobble, both feet in bounds, completes the catch all the way through without fumbling or using the ground in any manner). When M.D. touched his second foot that play was over and Tate did not have clear cut possession.</p><p>Tate never had clear possession and thus became a defender at the moment it was <strong>INT</strong>, not before M.D., not with M.D. and not after M.D. on the ground (that last part was inconsequential because the play was essentially dead once both of MDs feet touched in the end zone. It’s not the same as the field of play outside the Endzone, where you can fight for the ball until the receiver is officially down. That’s where your version falls apart, because it’s not “outside” the Endzone.</p><p></p><p>The League later both reviewed it admitted to an unfortunate missed call with substitute officials.</p><p></p><p>This all sounds to me like you are trying to hold on to your own version out of some sort of guilt, searching desperately for anyone who will corroborate your version, which doesn’t align with a panel of seasoned head referees.</p><p></p><p>If your version held. It would be like saying Lynch runs the ball into the Endzone with control and I grab the ball immediately after he crosses the goal line. And we fight for it. The possession goes to me? Cmon even you would say that’s absolutely ridiculous.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 859299, member: 10086"] By this definition you lose because your distorting the rule. MD [B]WAS[/B] the receiver at the point he caught it with both hands past the goal line. The GB player was the only player with clear cut possession and he had possession [B]first[/B] (becomes a [B]receiver[/B]) (both hands firmly on ball, no bobble, both feet in bounds, completes the catch all the way through without fumbling or using the ground in any manner). When M.D. touched his second foot that play was over and Tate did not have clear cut possession. Tate never had clear possession and thus became a defender at the moment it was [B]INT[/B], not before M.D., not with M.D. and not after M.D. on the ground (that last part was inconsequential because the play was essentially dead once both of MDs feet touched in the end zone. It’s not the same as the field of play outside the Endzone, where you can fight for the ball until the receiver is officially down. That’s where your version falls apart, because it’s not “outside” the Endzone. The League later both reviewed it admitted to an unfortunate missed call with substitute officials. This all sounds to me like you are trying to hold on to your own version out of some sort of guilt, searching desperately for anyone who will corroborate your version, which doesn’t align with a panel of seasoned head referees. If your version held. It would be like saying Lynch runs the ball into the Endzone with control and I grab the ball immediately after he crosses the goal line. And we fight for it. The possession goes to me? Cmon even you would say that’s absolutely ridiculous. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
weeds
gopkrs
mradtke66
Latest posts
Lazard Situation...
Latest: OldSchool101
4 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Questions that Define the Draft (2025)
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 4:32 PM
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 4:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 4:02 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: DoURant
Today at 3:53 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Divisional round: Seattle at Green Bay - payback time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
