Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="brandon2348" data-source="post: 601763" data-attributes="member: 7094">No I don't act like the "draft guru" and I am not a scout.  Everyone is entitled to there opinion and I don't see any law against having a disagreement.  However; my opinions have very little if nothing to do with highlight reels.  I watch a lot of football and I mean a lot.  Furthermore; If you insist my opinions are based on "highlight films" then yours are based purely on "combine results."This is why I hate the combine sometime because better athletes jump ahead of better football players based on measurables.  Both Perryman and Hardy win on "production on the field."  I agree that Lockett is a fine football player but drops some balls sometimes.  I think Dorsett is raw but is talented.  I never said those two guys weren't any good. I simply said for me the obvious choice would be Hardy based on "production on the field" and "tape".  The same goes for Perryman.What I do know is TT tends to agree as he drafts highly based on "production on field."  Maybe that's why is so successful.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 129 (members: 1, guests: 128)