Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 664145">Tough call.  Though Perry is the better football player, the fact he did everything but hang out a sign saying, "I want to play 4-3 DE", they took him anyway.  Playing NFL football is hard enough; having a guy who isn't all-in to his role is a pretty steep handicap.I don't blame the player.  In the right attacking 4-3 scheme where he would have been put in "release the hound" mode, I could see him as a 10 sack guy.So, did he get a cheap offer along those lines to come in and compete for a job, but took the better Packer money instead?  That would not be good.Or did it become apparent that Neal would not be re-signed, and with Peppers in the last year of his contract (with maybe a reduced snap count), this could be a year where he could make a mark and set himself up for a multi-year deal as the Peppers heir apparent?  That would be a good attitude to have.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 73 (members: 0, guests: 73)