Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 604886"><p>The PPF numbers exclude incompletions. They should have also excluded interceptions (a minor consideration), but you can't think of everything. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> That's a better number than tackles per snap. Hawk was not a good run defender. But he was not as bad as McGuin or most posters on this board want to portray him.</p><p></p><p>The point of this argument, which I'm sure you understand but others may not, is properly assessing Hawk's play sets the bar for what constitutes improvement in a 2-down ILB. That bar is higher than most think.</p><p></p><p>Of course, Spikes would blow through that threshold as would several ILB prospects in the first 2 rounds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 604886"] The PPF numbers exclude incompletions. They should have also excluded interceptions (a minor consideration), but you can't think of everything. ;) That's a better number than tackles per snap. Hawk was not a good run defender. But he was not as bad as McGuin or most posters on this board want to portray him. The point of this argument, which I'm sure you understand but others may not, is properly assessing Hawk's play sets the bar for what constitutes improvement in a 2-down ILB. That bar is higher than most think. Of course, Spikes would blow through that threshold as would several ILB prospects in the first 2 rounds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 7:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
How much time?
Latest: PackerDNA
Yesterday at 7:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Brewers 2025!
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:45 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:32 PM
Draft Talk
Your Do Not Draft List
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 6:30 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Compensatory Picks Announced
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top