Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="adambr2" data-source="post: 625165" data-attributes="member: 7277">Since I pointed out the bad from the Seattle game I should also point out the good.  The last few minutes of the game where we had it after the Elliot INT with the 7 point lead waa textbook clock management for late in the game with a lead.We were running the play clock all the way down every time, and if you go back and look at the 3:28 handoff to Starks, this was a wide stretch play by design.  The idea was to burn off a few more seconds than a straight dive, so they could take the next snap at 2:40 which they did and either run it all the way down to 2:00 or force Seattle to burn their last timeout, which they did.  It was only a 2 yard gain, but it likely saved them from having to run an extra play.The idea there with a 7 point lead should simply have been to run as much clock off as possible and ensure you take a 2 possession lead which is exactly what they did.</blockquote>

Total: 294 (members: 2, guests: 292)