Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Clinton-Dix at Cover Corner
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brandon2348" data-source="post: 609766" data-attributes="member: 7094"><p>I agree with everything you are saying but I do feel it is too early to say we don't have another optimal outside guy on the roster other then Shields. I mean people act like Tramon Williams was "big", "Physical" and had great "top end speed." He had none of those qualities.</p><p></p><p>IMO it is that some Packer fans don't see the type of outside corner they would prefer on the roster so now we don't have one in there mind. Once again, as I have posted before Randall has been called the best "cover guy" coming out of the draft regardless of position by many scouts and is more athletic then Tramon Williams was.</p><p></p><p>Then everyone get's all scared of the "big bad bears" and the "kitty kats" and there big receivers. The bottom line is were gonna truck both those teams and there bigger receivers haven't stopped us from winning the division for quite some time now.</p><p></p><p>The fact is we don't know yet if we have an "Optimal NFL outside guy" but my money would be that Randall will be serviceable there at the very least. I would also lean to project Collins as a future safety if had to choose but we simply don't know.</p><p></p><p>Nick Collins comparisons are a little far fetched at this point IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brandon2348, post: 609766, member: 7094"] I agree with everything you are saying but I do feel it is too early to say we don't have another optimal outside guy on the roster other then Shields. I mean people act like Tramon Williams was "big", "Physical" and had great "top end speed." He had none of those qualities. IMO it is that some Packer fans don't see the type of outside corner they would prefer on the roster so now we don't have one in there mind. Once again, as I have posted before Randall has been called the best "cover guy" coming out of the draft regardless of position by many scouts and is more athletic then Tramon Williams was. Then everyone get's all scared of the "big bad bears" and the "kitty kats" and there big receivers. The bottom line is were gonna truck both those teams and there bigger receivers haven't stopped us from winning the division for quite some time now. The fact is we don't know yet if we have an "Optimal NFL outside guy" but my money would be that Randall will be serviceable there at the very least. I would also lean to project Collins as a future safety if had to choose but we simply don't know. Nick Collins comparisons are a little far fetched at this point IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
PackerRyche
gopkrs
Latest posts
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: tynimiller
26 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
45 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
H
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:02 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
First Round Pick #23 - Matthew Golden WR - Texas
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 8:00 AM
Draft Talk
H
Packers Roster Assessment, 2025 Off-Season
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Clinton-Dix at Cover Corner
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top