Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chicago Tribune loving...the Packers? wwwhhhattt?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JBlood" data-source="post: 357280" data-attributes="member: 16"><p>good article, thanks for posting it. I saw this in one of the Tribune's blogs that I thought was interesting:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Posted by: Biff | <a href="http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/rosenblog/2011/02/what-the-packers-told-us-about-the-bears-hint-uh-oh.html?cid=6a00d83451583769e20147e262f53c970b#comment-6a00d83451583769e20147e262f53c970b" target="_blank">February 07, 2011 at 11:08 AM</a> </p><p> </p><p> I am not sure anyone saw what really happened this year. </p><p> Two teams figured out a strategy and economic hole in the NFL. The Packers and the Steelers.</p><p> Everyone calls their defense a 3-4. It is not. If you are paying any attention, they both play a 2-4-5.</p><p> First the strategic advantage. There must be five lineman on offense ineligible for a pass. Add a sixth in the QB and you can only have five potential offensive receivers. By playing a 2-4-5 that gives you nine potential players to allocate to the five potential offensive receivers. That frees you up to allocate four other fast defensive players to blitz and support the run. An offense can't run a hurry up as well. That is because the defense does not need to change personnel fast on second and third down with nickel and dime coverages. Finally the amount of QB reads is infinite.</p><p> Second the economic hole. The laws of supply and demand for big and athletic defensive lineman ensures they are the highest paid players in the game. By employing the 2-4-5 you only need two down lineman and with the second and third levels with so much help you only need guys who can run and hit hard. The laws of supply and demand are reversed. There is an abundance of players that can do it.</p><p> Why in the hell do you think the Packers could overcome so many injuries? How could they win the game without Woodson. Because it is not the players and the coaches as much as it is the system.</p><p> The NFL has always periodically seen new cutting edge strategies come along every once and a while. In this copycat league, after the labor dispute, look for teams to either copy the Packers and Steelers, build their offensive lines to go back to a running attack or for the NFL to change the rules (most unlikely).</p><p> But to call this Superbowl and the Packers a dynasty misses the entire point of strategic and economic arbitrage.</p><p> This kind of outthinking opponents is the only way to consistently win.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JBlood, post: 357280, member: 16"] good article, thanks for posting it. I saw this in one of the Tribune's blogs that I thought was interesting: Posted by: Biff | [URL="http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/rosenblog/2011/02/what-the-packers-told-us-about-the-bears-hint-uh-oh.html?cid=6a00d83451583769e20147e262f53c970b#comment-6a00d83451583769e20147e262f53c970b"]February 07, 2011 at 11:08 AM[/URL] I am not sure anyone saw what really happened this year. Two teams figured out a strategy and economic hole in the NFL. The Packers and the Steelers. Everyone calls their defense a 3-4. It is not. If you are paying any attention, they both play a 2-4-5. First the strategic advantage. There must be five lineman on offense ineligible for a pass. Add a sixth in the QB and you can only have five potential offensive receivers. By playing a 2-4-5 that gives you nine potential players to allocate to the five potential offensive receivers. That frees you up to allocate four other fast defensive players to blitz and support the run. An offense can't run a hurry up as well. That is because the defense does not need to change personnel fast on second and third down with nickel and dime coverages. Finally the amount of QB reads is infinite. Second the economic hole. The laws of supply and demand for big and athletic defensive lineman ensures they are the highest paid players in the game. By employing the 2-4-5 you only need two down lineman and with the second and third levels with so much help you only need guys who can run and hit hard. The laws of supply and demand are reversed. There is an abundance of players that can do it. Why in the hell do you think the Packers could overcome so many injuries? How could they win the game without Woodson. Because it is not the players and the coaches as much as it is the system. The NFL has always periodically seen new cutting edge strategies come along every once and a while. In this copycat league, after the labor dispute, look for teams to either copy the Packers and Steelers, build their offensive lines to go back to a running attack or for the NFL to change the rules (most unlikely). But to call this Superbowl and the Packers a dynasty misses the entire point of strategic and economic arbitrage. This kind of outthinking opponents is the only way to consistently win. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
My Top 100
Latest: AmishMafia
Today at 5:22 AM
Draft Talk
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 5:01 AM
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
R
Dome over Lambeau?
Latest: rmontro
Today at 1:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 11:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2025 Draft Media Stuff
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:40 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Chicago Tribune loving...the Packers? wwwhhhattt?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top