Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1003354" data-attributes="member: 7261">They would actually be eating $38M, $19 in 2023 and $19 in 2024.  However, that is a sunk cost, since it represents the money that was shoved forward.  No doubt it turned out to be a bad deal and one that I did not like at the time for a few reasons, but I understand wanting to keep your Pro Bowl LT.  Injuries happen and hard to use that as an argument against resigning, but its a cautionary tale on putting too much into 1 player.As far as the Rodgers resign, I think that was a way of trying to bury the hatchet with him.  It backfired and yeah, it cost the Packers, but I think the deal they got with the Jets, was about as well as things could be salvaged.</blockquote>

Total: 85 (members: 4, guests: 81)