Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fat Dogs" data-source="post: 878666" data-attributes="member: 12450">I don’t really care about the designations. We are both saying the same thing so there’s really no reason to argue about something so trivial so for that I apologize. Cutting a team to 53 isn’t easy but I don’t think that you are aware of how many teams actually carry 4 rb’s for depth and special teams. Here is a list of all NFC teams initial 53 man roster in 2019. I can do the AFC but I’m sure we will have similar results. Packers (4) 3 HB, 1 FBVikings (5) 4 HB,1 FB Bears (4) 4 HBLions (4) 3 HB, 1 FB49ers (4) 3 HB, 1 FBSeahawks (5) 4 HB, 1 FB Rams (3) 3 HBCardinals (4) 4 HBeagles (4) 4 HBCowboys (4) 4 HB if you count Zeke (holdout)Giants (4) 3 HB, 1 FBRedskins (5) 5 HB (1 placed on IR)Saints (4) 3 HB, 1 FBFalcons (3) 3 HBBucs (3) 3 HB Panthers (4) 3 HB, 1 FB I also looked at 2019 kick return leaders and 10 RB’s were in the top 32 so this helps explain the teams that rostered 4 HB’s. The packers keeping 4 RB’s (1 designated to return kicks wouldn’t be against the grain since 7 out of 16 NFC teams did it last season.</blockquote>

Total: 329 (members: 6, guests: 323)