Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
All Sitton & Lang & OL threads merged
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 675575" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>The thing with the whole Sitton "situation" is you have to differentiate between a comp pick and a pick we would have gotten had we been able to trade Sitton, while they may have ended up being around the same pick, they are completely different in value. I know most get this, but it seems like the 2 terms are being used interchangeably in some posts.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>comp pick value</strong> would only have been if we had kept Sitton, paid him his salary and not resigned him and were eligible for a comp pick. We would have had the value of Sittons services this year, a potential comp. pick at the cost of paying him and getting no cap savings.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>trade value</strong> would have been what we would have received from another team (our choice) had we been able to trade Sitton. We would have gotten a future draft pick and a cap savings of $6 + M but no services from Sitton.</p><p></p><p><strong>What we got</strong> was no Sitton, no trade or comp pick, but the cap savings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 675575, member: 7261"] The thing with the whole Sitton "situation" is you have to differentiate between a comp pick and a pick we would have gotten had we been able to trade Sitton, while they may have ended up being around the same pick, they are completely different in value. I know most get this, but it seems like the 2 terms are being used interchangeably in some posts. The [B]comp pick value[/B] would only have been if we had kept Sitton, paid him his salary and not resigned him and were eligible for a comp pick. We would have had the value of Sittons services this year, a potential comp. pick at the cost of paying him and getting no cap savings. The [B]trade value[/B] would have been what we would have received from another team (our choice) had we been able to trade Sitton. We would have gotten a future draft pick and a cap savings of $6 + M but no services from Sitton. [B]What we got[/B] was no Sitton, no trade or comp pick, but the cap savings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Top 30 Visits 2025
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 2:08 AM
Draft Talk
2025 Draft in Green Bay
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:05 AM
Draft Talk
Best FA in NFL History
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:03 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 9:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Price of ampitheater seating for NFL draft
Latest: Voyageur
Yesterday at 8:09 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
All Sitton & Lang & OL threads merged
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top